Motion Platforms for Simulators

Applications · For simulator OEMs and system integrators

Motion Simulator Platform for OEMs & Integrators

We design and manufacture custom electric 3DOF and 6DOF motion-platform subsystems for professional simulator OEMs and system integrators. Our scope can include the platform, controller and agreed platform-side interfaces for integration beneath an integrator-owned cockpit, cabin or research rig.

Supply boundary: our standard overseas scope stops at the motion-platform subsystem. The simulator host, flight or vehicle model, visual system, training content and complete-system qualification remain within the integrator’s scope unless separately agreed in writing.

Platform subsystem

Mechanical platform, actuation and contracted controls

3DOF or 6DOF

Selected from the motion task and complete moving load

Integrator interface

Commands, states, feedback and ownership defined

Platform-level FAT

Not complete simulator qualification or certification

One accountable platform subsystem

What the Motion Platform Supply Package Can Include

This page is for teams that already own—or are engineering—the surrounding simulator and need a manufacturer to design and supply the motion-platform layer.

We start with the moving assembly, motion objective, host architecture and acceptance boundary. A model number or nominal payload alone is not enough to approve a configuration.

A strong fit

Start a Platform Review If You Are…

Outside this page

This Is Not a Consumer Simulator Store

CSCMotion typically supplies

The Motion-Platform Layer

The integrator typically supplies

The Complete Simulator System

Find the correct application page

Choose by What the Platform Must Do

The same mechanism can serve different engineering purposes. Start with the required physical outcome and use the application page that owns that workflow.

Integrator-owned

Flight, Vehicle or Equipment Model

Apply a controlled trajectory to a component, fixture or complete test article.

Contract-defined

Motion Cueing or Command Layer

Ownership and tuning responsibility must be agreed.

Jointly defined

Interface Control Contract

Commands, coordinates, rates, states, faults and feedback.

CSCMotion scope

Motion Controller

Processes the approved platform command and operating state.

CSCMotion scope

Drives, Actuators and Platform

Creates motion within the approved load and workspace.

Integrator-owned

Moving Simulator Assembly

Cockpit, cabin, buck, users, displays, controls and cables.

Status, position feedback, readiness and safety signals return through the agreed interface. Complete-system behavior depends on every layer—not the motion platform alone.

Choose the specialist application path

Flight and Driving Simulator Platform Applications

The general integration framework is shared, but the moving assembly, motion objective, host architecture and validation method differ. Use the specialist page when the application is already known.

Flight simulator integrators

Flight Simulator Motion Platforms

Define the moving cockpit, mass properties, required cues, control-loading interaction, command source, safety chain and platform-level acceptance.

Boundary: cockpit, avionics, visual system, training content and complete-simulator qualification are not included by default.

Explore Flight Simulator Platforms →

DIL and vehicle research

Driving Simulator Motion Platforms

Define the vehicle buck, driver task, vehicle model or HIL architecture, cue set, display arrangement, interface timing and platform acceptance.

Boundary: this path is for professional integrators and research teams—not consumer sim-racing equipment or complete cockpit delivery.

Explore Driving Simulator Platforms →

Conditional application review

Other Professional Simulator Programs

Rail, heavy-equipment, special training and non-standard research simulators may use the same platform engineering principles, but each requires a defined moving load, motion source and system boundary.

No generic promise: we confirm feasibility only after reviewing current capability, project inputs and the requested supply scope.

Discuss a Special-Purpose Project →

Application first, model number second

Define the Simulator Before Selecting the Platform

These inputs allow us to review whether a motion platform is appropriate, which axes matter and what mechanical and control architecture deserves further calculation.

01 Simulator Purpose

Training, engineering development, DIL/HIL, research, demonstration or another defined task.

02 Complete Moving Assembly

Cockpit, cabin, seats, controls, displays, occupants, fixtures, cables and the full moving envelope.

03 Mass Properties

Gross moving mass, center of gravity, offsets, distribution and estimated inertia where available.

04 Motion Source & Objective

Model, cueing layer or trajectory source, plus the physical cues or motion result the platform must support.

05 Reference & Workspace

Axes, coordinate frame, reference point, combined translations and rotations, trajectory and duty cycle.

06 Host Interface

Command format, units, sign convention, update rate, state logic, feedback and fault handling.

07 Acceptance Method

Approved test load, representative trajectory, measurement point, independent instrument, tolerance, platform FAT, site SAT and documentation ownership.

A useful first submission: send the application objective, moving-assembly drawing, estimated total moving mass, known center of gravity, required axes and one representative command or motion profile. Unknown fields can be marked for engineering review.

Axis count is an outcome of the application

3DOF or 6DOF for a Professional Simulator?

Do not select a motion simulator platform from the industry label alone. The appropriate architecture follows the cue objective, moving load, mass properties, usable combined workspace and acceptance method.

Decision factor 3DOF motion platform 6DOF motion platform
Motion axes Three project-defined axes. The exact combination must be stated; not every 3DOF platform uses the same axes. Coordinated surge, sway, heave, roll, pitch and yaw within the approved combined workspace.
When to review it The cue objective is limited to a defined axis set, and space or system complexity is constrained. The application requires coupled translation and rotation or more complete control of the payload pose.
Engineering focus Confirm that the selected axes cover the real task and that tilt coordination or direct motion is acceptable. Review CG, inertia, actuator loads, kinematic limits, combined workspace and collision envelope together.
Integration Potentially lower complexity, but still requires a defined host, state model and safety boundary. Greater mechanical and control integration effort; six axes do not remove workspace limits.
Selection rule Choose the lowest-complexity architecture that satisfies the approved motion objective and validation criteria. Six degrees of freedom are not automatically better for every simulator.

Related product information: review our 3DOF motion platforms and 6DOF motion platforms after the application inputs have been defined.

Rated payload alone does not approve a platform

Payload, Center of Gravity and Motion Envelope

The platform moves the complete assembly, not a single catalog payload value. Two assemblies with the same mass can create very different actuator and structural demands.

Interface support is project-specific

Controller, Motion Cueing and Host-System Interfaces

We support the agreed platform-side interface. Compatibility with a specific simulator host, cueing package or third-party application must be reviewed and documented rather than assumed.

The project must also identify who owns motion cueing. An integrator may send approved target platform poses, or cueing may be treated as a separate contracted work package. The input, output, tuning responsibility and acceptance method must be clear before interface freeze.

Command type

Coordinate system

Units and signs

Update rate

Time handling

Operating states

Fault and reset logic

Status and feedback

Watchdog behavior

Cueing ownership

Interface control document

Freeze the Contract Between the Host and Platform

A useful interface specification states what enters the platform controller, what the controller returns and what each system must do during normal operation and faults.

Command payload
Pose, rate, acceleration or approved trajectory format
Reference definition
Coordinates, units, origin and rotation convention
Timing
Update interval, timestamps, buffering and timeout
State model
Disabled, ready, enabled, running, stopping and fault
Feedback
Actual states, positions, status and diagnostic scope
Safety response
Interlocks, command loss, limit event and reset ownership

A useful interface specification states what enters the platform controller, what the controller returns and what each system must do during normal operation and faults.

Make responsibility visible before detailed design

What CSCMotion Supplies—and What the Integrator Supplies

This working matrix should be adapted to the project and attached to the technical agreement. It prevents gaps between platform delivery and complete simulator integration.

Work package CSCMotion role Integrator / customer role Joint decision
Platform mechanics, actuators and drives Design and supply the contracted platform subsystem. Provide approved application requirements. Mounting interface and load cases.
Motion controller and electrical cabinet Supply and configure the contracted platform controls. Provide host, power and site requirements. Signals, interlocks and safety boundary.
Cockpit, cabin or vehicle buck Not normally supplied. Design and own the complete moving assembly. Mass, CG, inertia and attachment points.
Host model and simulation content Not normally supplied. Own the model, scenario and training content. Data delivered to the platform boundary.
Motion cueing Only within the contracted scope. Own it when implemented in the host architecture. Algorithm ownership, tuning and acceptance.
Visual, audio and instructor functions Not normally supplied. Own and integrate surrounding simulator systems. Confirm which equipment moves with the platform.
Host-to-platform interface Platform side Host side Protocol, rate, coordinates, states and faults.
Platform FAT Execute the agreed platform-level checks. Provide requirements, test load or witness as agreed. Trajectory, instruments and pass criteria.
Site SAT and complete-system qualification Support only within the contract. System lead Integration schedule and evidence handover.
Three different assurance levels

Platform Safety, FAT and Simulator-Level Acceptance

The motion platform must be verified within its agreed boundary. That evidence supports—but does not replace—the integrator’s complete-system validation.

01 Platform Safety Functions

Review limits, emergency stop, drive states, controlled stopping, communication loss and mechanical or electrical boundaries for the contracted configuration.

02 Platform Factory Acceptance

Verify assembly, motion, signals, approved load, representative trajectory, measurement points and required records against the agreed FAT plan.

03 Complete Simulator Acceptance

Validate the host, cockpit, visual system, software, training functions, site environment and all cross-system behavior under the integrator’s authority.

Certification boundary: CSCMotion does not present a standalone motion platform as an FAA- or EASA-certified complete simulator. We provide only the documents and test evidence included in the contracted platform scope.

From application review to supplied subsystem

A Defined Path to Platform Delivery

We keep the application, interface and acceptance boundary visible as the project moves from early review into detailed engineering and manufacture.

Step 01

Application Review

Confirm simulator purpose, customer role, moving assembly and required supply boundary.

Step 02

Motion & Geometry Review

Evaluate axes, mass properties, reference point, workspace, trajectory and site envelope.

Step 03

Interface Freeze

Approve mechanical, electrical, command, state, safety and documentation responsibilities.

Step 04

Manufacture & FAT

Build the contracted platform and verify it against the approved platform-level test plan.

Step 05

Delivery & Support

Hand over the platform, records and agreed remote or on-site integration support.

 

For detailed work-package definitions, interface deliverables and integration responsibilities, review our dedicated solution page.

Show the product, project stage and test context

Motion Platform Project Evidence

Replace these placeholders with permission-cleared CSCMotion material. Every image or video should identify the platform configuration, what was being built or tested and which result the evidence can actually support.

Mechanical integration

Platform Beneath the Moving Assembly

Caption the complete moving load, attachment interface, CSCMotion supply and project stage.

Application-specific 3DOF

Defined Axes for a Defined Task

Explain why the selected three-axis set covered the approved application requirement.

Control interface

Host-to-Platform Commissioning

Identify the command boundary, test stage and interface items verified without exposing customer-confidential data.

Application requirements lead to product architecture

Related Motion Platforms and Integration Support

Use these pages after the simulator application has defined the load, motion objective, interface and acceptance boundary.

Three defined axes

3DOF Motion Platform

Review when a project-specific three-axis set covers the required simulator task.

Review 3DOF Platforms →
Six-axis motion

6DOF Motion Platform

Review for coordinated translation and rotation in a defined combined workspace.

Review 6DOF Platforms →
Parallel kinematics

Stewart Platform

Understand the configurable mechanism behind many six-axis simulator platforms.

Review Stewart Platforms →
Platform controls

Motion Control System

Review controller, states, commands, feedback and project-specific interface support.

Review Control Systems →
OEM work package

Integration Support

Define mechanical, electrical, controller and host-side responsibilities for an approved platform project.

Review Integration Support →

Commercial and engineering questions

Motion Simulator Platform Questions

These answers define the normal project boundary. The approved specification and interface documents control the final configuration.

Our normal scope is the engineered motion-platform subsystem: the mechanical platform, electric actuation, drives, controller, electrical cabinet, agreed platform-side interfaces, documentation and platform-level factory acceptance testing. The exact supply boundary is defined in the project specification.

Our standard overseas scope does not include a complete simulator. The simulator OEM or system integrator normally owns the cockpit or vehicle buck, host model, visual and audio systems, training content, instructor functions and complete-system qualification.

Not exactly. Six degrees of freedom describes the available motion. Stewart platform describes a parallel-kinematic architecture commonly used to create six-axis motion. A Stewart mechanism can be configured differently according to load, workspace and geometry. For deeper engineering context, read Stewart Platform Design.

CSCMotion focuses on electric motion platforms. The actuator, drive, power, duty-cycle and thermal configuration are reviewed for each project rather than assumed from a single catalogue rating.

Payload selection uses the complete moving assembly, center of gravity, inertia, offset loads, mounting geometry and required dynamic acceleration. A kilogram value alone is not enough to size the structure and actuators. High-load projects should begin with the High-Payload Motion Platform page.

Start with the simulator requirement

Define the Motion Platform Around Your Simulator

Send the simulator purpose, moving-assembly drawing, estimated total moving mass, known center of gravity, required axes or cue objective and host-interface information. We will identify the missing inputs and the platform architecture worth reviewing.

Company, project role and simulator purpose

Moving-assembly drawing or 3D model

Gross moving mass, CG and known inertia

Required axes, cues or representative trajectory

Reference point and usable motion envelope

Host, command source and update rate

Safety, FAT and documentation expectations

Destination, site conditions and schedule

Scroll to Top